Hi Renè, Renè Glanzer wrote at Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 09:47:
> OK so my search will continue :-) > Meanwhile I'll consider to change my implementation, which i'd like to > prevent. I've reopened COLLECTIONS-3, since I was able to write a unit test that reproduces the problem. > Maybe somebody of you knows a time and size based cache system where i can > map a key to an object? My enhancement of the unit test for the LRUMap shows, that the ConcurrentModificationException only happens, if you use an iterator form the keySet. So you should simply use the entrySet in your code and you'll be fine. - Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@commons.apache.org
