Hi Jörg, that are great news, I'll give it a try. And of course I'll report my experience.
René 2009/6/17 Jörg Schaible <[email protected]> > Hi Renè, > > Renè Glanzer wrote at Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2009 09:47: > > > OK so my search will continue :-) > > Meanwhile I'll consider to change my implementation, which i'd like to > > prevent. > > I've reopened COLLECTIONS-3, since I was able to write a unit test that > reproduces the problem. > > > Maybe somebody of you knows a time and size based cache system where i > can > > map a key to an object? > > My enhancement of the unit test for the LRUMap shows, that the > ConcurrentModificationException only happens, if you use an iterator form > the keySet. So you should simply use the entrySet in your code and you'll > be fine. > > - Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
