Hi Atecurrently testing what happens when log4j.properties or log4j.xml is
missing (cured by inserting a working log4j.properties into scxml classpath)
I am currently experiencing this failure:
Javadoc failure with:
Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error generating
maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:javadoc:Exit code: 1 -
\scxml\src\main\java\org\apache\commons\scxml2\SCInstanceObjectInputStream.java:80:
error: unexpected end tag: </p> * </p>
Here is the code:
/** * Set custom class resolver callback, or null when no longer needed.
* <p> * Typically usage: * <pre><code> * private void
readObject(ObjectInputStream in) throws IOException,ClassNotFoundException {
* ClassResolver currentClassResolver = null; * try { *
if (in instanceof SCInstanceObjectInputStream) { *
currentClassResolver =
((SCInstanceObjectInputStream)in).setClassResolver(customClassResolver); *
} * ... // read Object(s) * } * finally {
* if (in instanceof SCInstanceObjectInputStream) { *
((SCInstanceObjectInputStream)in).setClassResolver(currentClassResolver); *
} * } * } * </code></pre> * </p> * @see
org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.groovy.GroovyContext#readObject(ObjectInputStream)
* @param classResolver custom class resolver */ public
ClassResolver setClassResolver(ClassResolver classResolver) {
ClassResolver old = this.classResolver; this.classResolver =
classResolver; return old; }
fubars javadoc and fails the build..for now i can comment out the <p> and </p>
inside comments to bypass
Suggestions are welcomethanksMartin
______________________________________________
> Subject: Re: SCXML project
> To: [email protected]
> From: [email protected]
> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 22:10:50 +0100
>
> On 2016-01-26 22:36, Martin Gainty wrote:
> >
> > mvn package doesnt package (testcase fails) currently
> > <testcase name="testSCXMLExecutorTransitions02Sample"
> > classname="org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutorTest" time="0.03">
> > <error type="java.lang.NullPointerException:">
> > java.lang.NullPointerException: null at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLog.isDebugEnabled(SLF4JLog.java:49) at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.setLocal(SimpleContext.java:178)
> > at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.initializeIOProcessors(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:358)
> > at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutionContext.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutionContext.java:397)
> > at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutor.attachInstance(SCXMLExecutor.java:398)
> > at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLTestHelper.testInstanceSerializability(SCXMLTestHelper.java:258)
> > at
> >
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.SCXMLExecutorTest.testSCXMLExecutorTransitions02Sample(SCXMLExecutorTest.java:139)
> >
> > correct this small bug lurking in
> > org.apache.commons.scxml2.env.SimpleContext.java
> >
> > /**
> > * Assigns a new value to an existing variable or creates a new one.
> > * The method allows to shaddow a variable of the same name up the
> > * Context chain.
> > *
> > * @param name The variable name
> > * @param value The variable value
> > * @see org.apache.commons.scxml2.Context#setLocal(String, Object)
> > * as someone forgot to initialize log toss a System.out.println
> > */
> > public void setLocal(final String name, final Object value) {
> > getVars().put(name, value);
> > try {
> > if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
> > log.debug(name + " = " + String.valueOf(value));
> > }
> > }
> > catch(NullPointerException npe) {
> > System.out.println("SimpleContext::setLocal log.isDebugEnabled()
> > where log="+log+" name="+name+" throws NPE");
> > }
> > }
> >
> > *Obrigado Guilherme*
> > MartÃn
>
> AFAICT the above NPE only can occur when configuring an invalid/wrong logging
> class (like in the pom.xml for the maven-surefire-plugin) and/or through
> explicitly set the the Log instance to null in SimpleContext.java.
>
> When using a clean checkout/clone of the current SCXML git repository
> (master)
> this definitely is not the case, and mvn package works just fine.
>
> So possibly you have local modifications, either to the pom.xml logging
> configuration or otherwise causing this exception?
>
> Regards, Ate
>
> >
> >> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 23:42:01 -0200
> >> Subject: Re: SCXML project
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> To: [email protected]
> >>
> >> Ok Folks,
> >>
> >>
> >> I will evaluate SCXML.
> >>
> >> BTW, I found these paper and it sounds interesting:
> >>
> >> http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/46457.pdf
> >>
> >> It looks like it exports Stateflow to SCXML
> >
> > MG>will Stateflow support Harel FSM?
> > MG>Please confirmMG>Obrigado!
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Martin Gainty <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>> Thanks Gary!
> >>> Martin Gainty
> >>> ______________________________________________
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 14:07:08 -0800
> >>>> Subject: Re: SCXML project
> >>>> From: [email protected]
> >>>> To: [email protected]
> >>>>
> >>>> Guilherme,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have not seen much activity. We are all volunteers here, if you want
> >>> the
> >>>> project to move forward, feel free to talk on this list, create Jiras,
> >>> and
> >>>> provide patches.
> >>>>
> >>>> Gary
> >>>> On Jan 22, 2016 8:58 AM, "Guilherme Silveira" <
> >>> [email protected]>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi Folks
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am new to FSM and new to SCXML. On the other hand, I am expert in
> >>>>> Simulink, expert in Java and expert in model based systems engineering.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I am currently evaluating SCXML and I would like a*honest, non biased
> >>>>> opinion *on the status of SCXML project.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What I would like to assert if this project has a future, the number of
> >>>>> developers, if the SCXML specification will ever reach a stable
> >>>>> status....and so on
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So far, I have noticed few integrations with proprietary softwares....
> >>>>> Simulink Stateflow does not export to SCXML, neither does IBM Rhapsody.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How difficult would it be to create custom tool for these
> >>> integrations? And
> >>>>> most important, is it REALLY possible to implement in Java all the
> >>>>> functionalities of Simulink Stateflow, without any drawback, with a
> >>>>> friendly user experience and a steep learning curve?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ps: I am not from telecom industry
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
