On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 09:30:19PM +1030, Antony Blakey wrote: > > On 28/01/2009, at 9:10 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> >> On 28 Jan 2009, at 11:31, Brian Candler wrote: >> >>> BTW, I do think the atomic nature of bulk_docs is useful and should >>> be kept, >>> as it's the only way to get "transaction" semantics at the moment. >> >> We won't be able to guarantee transactions in a multi-node setup. > > And there's a universe of single-node applications.
I would prefer a predictable interface over single-node special-casing. -- Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
