2009/1/28 Antony Blakey <[email protected]>: >>> And furthermore, where's the community discussion about this? >> >> I think this might be the community discussion. > > Rather after the fact, isn't it?
CouchDB has assumed multiple nodes from it's inception. So any discussion that alters that basic principal is going to be after the fact. The project wasn't set up as blank page with a group of people discussing what they wanted to do, it was a single persons vision. A vision that other people thought was cool and have come together to make it better. Jumping all over principal assumptions of the platform and then complaining that there has been no discussion is just silly. It's not that this can't be discussed, I'm sure everyone here is open to any discussion on any aspect of CouchDB, but it does have momentum you may have to overcome. So we can have the discussion, but don't get bent out of shape just because the current strategy hasn't been discussed when that strategy was brought into the project from the start. -- Kerr
