Thanks for the heads up! Back to the drawing board... (^_-)
2009/9/14 Göran Krampe <[email protected]>: > Zachary Zolton wrote: >> >> Göran, >> >> I'm no Varnish expert, but it my informal testing (which means just >> tailing the CouchDB log) I could see that when I request a page the >> first time I saw a bunch of GETs, and when I hit refresh, the GETs >> were not repeated. So, I'd have to assume Varnish respects the Etags. > > Mmmm, no :). What you can assume is that it does indeed show "cache > behavior". But AFAIK it is purely based on a TTL. Which probably is 120 > seconds per default. > > I looked into this in detail a while back and couldn't come to any other > conclusion than that in fact, Varnish doesn't do etags at all. > > Which is a pity because otherwise Varnish looks quite cool. > > regards, Göran > >
