On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected]> wrote: > Regardless of the efficiency of term_to_binary, there's really no comparison > between the standalone attachment API streaming bytes almost directly to disk > and the inline one buffering the whole attachment in memory and inflating it > by 37% to boot. Definitely use the standalone API if at all possible. Best, > > Adam >
About that, it would be good to have an option to attach to a specific revision of a doc without incrementing it. I know that's the reason why couchapp use inline attachments. Some complained it increases the number of revisions when you send a lot of attachments. What do you think ? - benoit
