On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected]> wrote: >> Regardless of the efficiency of term_to_binary, there's really no comparison >> between the standalone attachment API streaming bytes almost directly to >> disk and the inline one buffering the whole attachment in memory and >> inflating it by 37% to boot. Definitely use the standalone API if at all >> possible. Best, >> >> Adam >> > > About that, it would be good to have an option to attach to a specific > revision of a doc without incrementing it. I know that's the reason > why couchapp use inline attachments. Some complained it increases the > number of revisions when you send a lot of attachments. > > What do you think ? > > - benoit >
Isn't there a multipart-mime PUT thing now? I don't think the "put attachment without changing the _rev" behavior is a good idea. Paul
