On 25 Nov 2010, at 13:39, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 13:35, afters <[email protected]> wrote: >> Could you elaborate a bit? this sounds like a full backup to me? > > (please post your reply below the text you're replying to, to > facilitate linear reading)
Please don't rip out most of the discussion so I know where this belongs in context. (not seriously, but making a point: everybody has different taste in email etiquette and no one quoting style is correct for everybody. If anything, please ask nicely if the poster would consider changing his style.) FWIW, I don't care much either way as I get top and bottom quote mixed emails all the time. I even write both :) Cheers Jan -- > > No, replication only propagates document revisions that are new in the > source database. You can see in Futon how a database maintains an > "Update Seq", which is an identifier for the full contents of the > database at the time. By only transmitting only the updates after a > seq the target database already has, replication is fairly efficient. > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan
