Hi Brian, On 20 Dec 2010, at 23:08, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> On 20 Dec 2010, at 23:05, Brian Mitchell wrote: > >> I have verified that CouchDB users love URLs but don't tend to read them >> because their database is too slow. >> >> (Joking aside, I find it annoying that people can't ever manage to answer >> things without storming off and writing long blog posts on methods of >> measurement or simply never actually answering things with any more >> substance than the things they seem to attack as poor evidence. I do realize >> there is a large gap here and apples vs. oranges isn't productive, but >> neither is this.) > > +1 Paul on IRC reminds me that this might have been target at me, funny :) The blog posts are for background which is generally lacking as these benchmarks keep coming up. I did point out why this is a bad scenario for CouchDB and offered an explanation of better scenarios, but I can't go and define your scenario because, well, it's yours. That is the whole point of my stupid benchmarks are stupid argument. I also did offer more information if requested and I am happy to go into the details of why CouchDB performs better under concurrent load if requested. If you are requesting that, can you formulate a question? :) Thanks for your feedback. Cheers Jan --
