On 24 December 2011 13:46, Robert Newson <[email protected]> wrote: > I believe Jim is referring to the replication checkpoint document > (which does indeed include 'historical' information). Jim is also > correct in that the presence of this document will prevent a full > re-replication when the target's validate_doc_update function is > altered. > > Jim, the replication checkpoint document is named in the way: > /dbname/_local/<hash>. You should be able to see this document being > written to in the logs and the <hash> portion is also the value you > get back when POST'ing to _replicate (and the one shown in > _active_tasks). Delete the document in the usual fashion and > replication will do over from the start. > > B. >
Sorry Jim! thanks Bob for catching that.. I have some homework to do! A+ Dave
