Do I dare ask what the ETA for 1.2.0 release is? - Jim
On Jan 3, 2012, at 8:04 AM, Filipe David Manana <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, in 1.2.0 you'll no longer need the hack of editing replication > checkpoint documents in order to bootstrap replications from a > particular sequence number. You can simply specify a parameter named > "since_seq" in replication objects/documents. > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Jan 3, 2012, at 10:41 AM, Filipe David Manana wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Adam Kocoloski <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Jan 3, 2012, at 3:23 AM, Paul Hirst wrote: >>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Robert Newson [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Sent: 24 December 2011 12:46 >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: Delete replication history >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe Jim is referring to the replication checkpoint document >>>>>> (which does indeed include 'historical' information). Jim is also >>>>>> correct in that the presence of this document will prevent a full >>>>>> re-replication when the target's validate_doc_update function is >>>>>> altered. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jim, the replication checkpoint document is named in the way: >>>>>> /dbname/_local/<hash>. You should be able to see this document being >>>>>> written to in the logs and the <hash> portion is also the value you >>>>>> get back when POST'ing to _replicate (and the one shown in >>>>>> _active_tasks). Delete the document in the usual fashion and >>>>>> replication will do over from the start. >>>>> >>>>> I've only ever been able to find the hash value in the log. If it's in >>>>> _active_tasks where is it? >>>>> >>>>> My replication entries in _active_tasks look like >>>>> >>>>> ba3959: http://myserver.example:5984/mydb/ -> mydb >>>>> >>>>> And I don't believe ba3959 is long enough. Isn't the hash an MD5 of the >>>>> replication information? >>>>> >>>>> If there was a way to get it out of _active_tasks it would be extremely >>>>> convenient. >>>>> >>>>> Sophos Limited, The Pentagon, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon, OX14 3YP, >>>>> United Kingdom. >>>>> Company Reg No 2096520. VAT Reg No GB 991 2418 08. >>>> >>>> >>>> Currently _active_tasks only reports the first six characters of the hash. >>>> I'm not opposed to having it report the full hash, especially now that >>>> the _active_tasks output is semi-structured. >>> >>> The branch for the next major release, 1.2.x, already reports the full >>> id (unlike all current releases which only report the first 6 >>> characters in _active_tasks). >> >> Ah, thanks for the correction Filipe! > > > > -- > Filipe David Manana, > > "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. > Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. > That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."
