On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote: > While it won't appear in the changes feed, they do track the > update_seq they originally had IIRC. I sure don't think we surface > that anywhere. > > Ciprian, is there a specific need for this or is this for something > app specific?
I've written a separate email to describe what I want to achieve,
with the subject:
Simple "transactional" access (i.e. "repeatable reads")
