I'll also note that there's no atomicity to a _bulk_docs request (even with all_or_nothing:true) except at the individual document level (as usual).
B. On 18 December 2012 21:38, Ciprian Dorin Craciun <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:02 PM, Paul Davis > <[email protected]> wrote: >> While it won't appear in the changes feed, they do track the >> update_seq they originally had IIRC. I sure don't think we surface >> that anywhere. >> >> Ciprian, is there a specific need for this or is this for something >> app specific? > > > I've written a separate email to describe what I want to achieve, > with the subject: > Simple "transactional" access (i.e. "repeatable reads")
