svilen wrote: > yeah, checked all those. They are post-factum, file synchronizers - can > not manage directories (rename a dir => copy all the dir again). > The only thing that manages directories is bazaar but it chokes after > 8-9Gb of data (out of memory). Anyway seems i need to separate > filesystem metadata (filenames, directories etc) from actual raw > datafiles. e.g. fancy hierarchy of hardlinks, pointing to flat-dir > files. And apply separate syncs to those two. But should think it out > first.
What's the reason using something like DRBD+OCFS2 (or network filesystems in general?) is not an option? Nils.
