Nils Breunese <[email protected]> wrote: > > What's the reason using something like DRBD+OCFS2 (or network > filesystems in general?) is not an option? general lazyness/no-time-ness, and no extra partitions/disks for that.
> svilen wrote: > > > yeah, checked all those. They are post-factum, file synchronizers - > > can not manage directories (rename a dir => copy all the dir again). > > The only thing that manages directories is bazaar but it chokes > > after 8-9Gb of data (out of memory). Anyway seems i need to separate > > filesystem metadata (filenames, directories etc) from actual raw > > datafiles. e.g. fancy hierarchy of hardlinks, pointing to flat-dir > > files. And apply separate syncs to those two. But should think it > > out first.
