Has anyone looked into the performance of attachments as the DB increases in size? From my reading, npm needed to move away from couchdb attachments. Its not clear to me if that was due to performance issues, replication issues, or administrative issues with the very large db file.
On 9/22/15, 4:32 PM, "Adam Kocoloski" <[email protected]> wrote: >Yes, actually we do have something in the works related to COUCHDB-769 to >offload attachments to an external object storage system. We preserve the >CouchDB API so an end user can’t tell if the offloading is happening. I’m >overdue to get the code posted, and it’s only a prototype so it’ll need some >work, but glad to see there’s interest here. I’ll look to get this posted on >Wednesday. Cheers, > >Adam
