Hi Daniel,
Do you have 'delayed_commits' set to true? It's now defaulted to false in
couch 2.0, but it really causes a pretty hefty performance hit when
disabled.

Peyton

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Daniel Adam <daniel.adam...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> I'm running an index/view re-generation with 10M documents, 10views, having
> 1 node and 8 shards on it.
> It seems it will take more than 1 day. What are limiting factors for that?
> Looking at perfromance monitoring tools (Task Manager and Process
> Explorer), it seems neither I/O or CPU is saturated:
> CPU (8 cores) each core taking <30% its capacity
> I/O reads ~ 8MB/s
> I/O writes ~ 1.5MB/s
>
> Windows 7 64bit
> 16GB memory
> Intel i7-4800 @ 2.7GHz
> HDD Seagate ST500LM0
>
> Any explanation why the system limits are not being saturated? Seems to me
> the bottleneck is I/O, but the disk is capable of 100MB/s throughput in
> sequential reads/writes. If the limiting factor is indeed I/O, I assume
> changing number of shards would not gain much, possibly even 1 shard would
> provide a similar speed.
>
> Any way to improve the speed of index rebuild?
>
> Thanks,
> Daniel
>

Reply via email to