Hi Daniel, Do you have 'delayed_commits' set to true? It's now defaulted to false in couch 2.0, but it really causes a pretty hefty performance hit when disabled.
Peyton On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Daniel Adam <daniel.adam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I'm running an index/view re-generation with 10M documents, 10views, having > 1 node and 8 shards on it. > It seems it will take more than 1 day. What are limiting factors for that? > Looking at perfromance monitoring tools (Task Manager and Process > Explorer), it seems neither I/O or CPU is saturated: > CPU (8 cores) each core taking <30% its capacity > I/O reads ~ 8MB/s > I/O writes ~ 1.5MB/s > > Windows 7 64bit > 16GB memory > Intel i7-4800 @ 2.7GHz > HDD Seagate ST500LM0 > > Any explanation why the system limits are not being saturated? Seems to me > the bottleneck is I/O, but the disk is capable of 100MB/s throughput in > sequential reads/writes. If the limiting factor is indeed I/O, I assume > changing number of shards would not gain much, possibly even 1 shard would > provide a similar speed. > > Any way to improve the speed of index rebuild? > > Thanks, > Daniel >