HI Aurélien, Your email is aggressive, and your apology is not accepted. I disagree that a "significant part of the user base" needs this functionality, as do the overwhelming majority of the PMC and the commercial entities on this mailing list.
This topic has been discussed to death on the mailing lists and I am not going to be pulled into a retread of this argument. For the latest developer discussions on this topic, search for the words "Deprecation Wishlist" in this message: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201702.mbox/%3CB6DB98EC-42B1-4960-9E43-257F040238F1%40apache.org%3E You may also want to search on the word "NoJS". -Joan ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Aurélien Bénel" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2017 9:33:38 AM > Subject: Re: views failing due to fabric_worker_timeout and OS process timed > out > > Hi Joan, > > > couchapps are, in effect, deprecated functionality. > > What do you mean exactly by saying this? > That CouchDB is now just a DB and no more an application server? > That all the time and code invested by my team and my partners since > 2010 are now wasted? > That I should stop immediately teaching CouchDB in my university as a > perfect example on how to implement a RESTful API and Web > application? > > Which features needed for « couchapps » are going to disappear in > future releases? > > Is it a definitive decision? Or is it still possible to discuss it? > > > Regards, > > Aurélien > > P.S. Sorry if my e-mail looks aggressive, but I’m really really > worried… > I’m surprised too to discover such an important news on a nearly > unrelated topic, whereas the last time the need for « couchapps » > were discussed on the « user » list, a few years ago, there was a > consensus that it was a really important feature for a significant > part of the user base.
