You can see the revision number and the build date in the JobManager
log file, e.g. "Starting JobManager (Version: 0.10-SNAPSHOT,
Rev:1b79bc1, Date:18.10.2015 @ 20:15:08 CEST)"

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> wrote:
> When was the last time you updated your 0.10-SNAPSHOT Flink cluster?
> If it has been more than a couple of weeks, then I'd advise you to
> update to the latest snapshot version. There has been an issue with
> the calculation of the off-heap memory limit in the past.
>
> Thanks,
> Max
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's 0.10-SNAPSHOT
>>
>> Gyula
>>
>> Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2015. okt. 19., H,
>> 17:13):
>>>
>>> I forgot to ask you: Which version of Flink are you using? 0.9.1 or
>>> 0.10-SNAPSHOT?
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Jakob,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks. Flink allocates its network memory as direct memory outside
>>> > the normal Java heap. By default, that is 64MB but can grow up to
>>> > 128MB on heavy network transfer. How much memory does your machine
>>> > have? Could it be that your upper memory bound is lower than 2048 +
>>> > 128 MB?
>>> >
>>> > Best,
>>> > Max
>>> >
>>> > On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Jakob Ericsson
>>> > <jakob.erics...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> See answers below.
>>> >>
>>> >> /Jakob
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Maximilian Michels <m...@apache.org>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi Jakob,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thank you for reporting the bug. Could you please post your
>>> >>> configuration here? In particular, could you please tell us the value
>>> >>> of the following configuration variables:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> taskmanager.heap.mb
>>> >>
>>> >> taskmanager.heap.mb: 2048
>>> >>>
>>> >>> taskmanager.network.numberOfBuffers
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Default value. Not changed.
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> taskmanager.memory.off-heap
>>> >>>
>>> >> Default value Not changed.
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Are you running the Flink cluster in batch or streaming mode?
>>> >>>
>>> >> Started in streaming mode. Running with two nodes. In the cluster.
>>> >> Also, I have set the "env.java.opts: -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC" due to
>>> >> some
>>> >> strange java core dumps in the G1 GC.
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Direct memory is used by Flink's network layer. My guess is that you
>>> >>> have set taskmanager.heap.mb too low (it constraints the number of
>>> >>> direct memory at the moment).
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thank you,
>>> >>> Max
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Jakob Ericsson
>>> >>> <jakob.erics...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> > Hello,
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > We are running into a strange problem with Direct Memory buffers.
>>> >>> > From
>>> >>> > what
>>> >>> > I know, we are not using any direct memory buffers inside our code.
>>> >>> > This is pretty trivial streaming application just doing some
>>> >>> > dedupliction
>>> >>> > and union some kafka streams.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > /Jakob
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > 2015-10-19 13:27:59,064 INFO
>>> >>> > org.apache.flink.runtime.taskmanager.Task
>>> >>> > - FilterAndTransform -> (Filter, Filter) (3/4) switched to FAILED
>>> >>> > with
>>> >>> > exception.
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.netty.exception.LocalTransportException:
>>> >>> > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Direct buffer memory
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > org.apache.flink.runtime.io.network.netty.PartitionRequestClientHandler.exceptionCaught(PartitionRequestClientHandler.java:153)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeExceptionCaught(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:246)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireExceptionCaught(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:224)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter.exceptionCaught(ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter.java:131)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeExceptionCaught(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:246)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireExceptionCaught(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:224)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter.exceptionCaught(ChannelInboundHandlerAdapter.java:131)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeExceptionCaught(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:246)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.notifyHandlerException(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:737)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:310)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:294)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.fireChannelRead(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:846)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioByteChannel$NioByteUnsafe.read(AbstractNioByteChannel.java:131)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKey(NioEventLoop.java:511)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeysOptimized(NioEventLoop.java:468)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeys(NioEventLoop.java:382)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:354)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$2.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:112)
>>> >>> >         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
>>> >>> > Caused by: io.netty.handler.codec.DecoderException:
>>> >>> > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Direct buffer memory
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageDecoder.channelRead(ByteToMessageDecoder.java:234)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:308)
>>> >>> >         ... 9 more
>>> >>> > Caused by: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Direct buffer memory
>>> >>> >         at java.nio.Bits.reserveMemory(Bits.java:658)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> > java.nio.DirectByteBuffer.<init>(DirectByteBuffer.java:123)
>>> >>> >         at java.nio.ByteBuffer.allocateDirect(ByteBuffer.java:311)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.buffer.PoolArena$DirectArena.newUnpooledChunk(PoolArena.java:651)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> > io.netty.buffer.PoolArena.allocateHuge(PoolArena.java:237)
>>> >>> >         at io.netty.buffer.PoolArena.allocate(PoolArena.java:215)
>>> >>> >         at io.netty.buffer.PoolArena.reallocate(PoolArena.java:358)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> > io.netty.buffer.PooledByteBuf.capacity(PooledByteBuf.java:111)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.ensureWritable(AbstractByteBuf.java:251)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> > io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.writeBytes(AbstractByteBuf.java:849)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> > io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.writeBytes(AbstractByteBuf.java:841)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> > io.netty.buffer.AbstractByteBuf.writeBytes(AbstractByteBuf.java:831)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageDecoder$1.cumulate(ByteToMessageDecoder.java:92)
>>> >>> >         at
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageDecoder.channelRead(ByteToMessageDecoder.java:228)
>>> >>> >         ... 10 more
>>> >>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>
  • [no subject] Jakob Ericsson
    • Re: Maximilian Michels
      • Re: Jakob Ericsson
        • Re: Maximilian Michels
          • Re: Maximilian Michels
            • Re: Gyula Fóra
              • Re: Maximilian Michels
                • Re: Maximilian Michels
                • Re: Jakob Ericsson
                • Re: Maximilian Michels
                • Re: Stephan Ewen
                • Re: Jakob Ericsson

Reply via email to