We wrote our own source. I noticed our back pressure changed from ok to high 
after relance().timeWindowAll(), if there is no obvious change on that, the 
problem can be in our function after this.


> On 09 Aug 2016, at 12:10, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> Which source are you using?
> 
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com 
> <mailto:andrew.ge...@eniro.com>> wrote:
> Hi Robert
> 
> 
> Thanks for the quick reply, I guess I’m one of the early birds.
> Yes, it is much slower, I’m not sure why, I copied slaves, masters, 
> log4j.properties and flink-conf.yaml directly from 1.0.3
> I have parallelization 1 on my sources, I can increase that to achieve the 
> same speed, but I’m interested to know why is that.
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> Andrew
>> On 09 Aug 2016, at 11:47, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org 
>> <mailto:rmetz...@apache.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Andrew,
>> 
>> here is the release announcement, with a list of all changes: 
>> http://flink.apache.org/news/2016/08/08/release-1.1.0.html 
>> <http://flink.apache.org/news/2016/08/08/release-1.1.0.html>, 
>> http://flink.apache.org/blog/release_1.1.0-changelog.html 
>> <http://flink.apache.org/blog/release_1.1.0-changelog.html>
>> 
>> What does the chart say? Are the results different? is Flink faster or 
>> slower now?
>> 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Robert
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com 
>> <mailto:andrew.ge...@eniro.com>> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> We found out there is a new stable version released: 1.1.0 but we can not 
>> find any release note.
>> Do anyone know where to find it?
>> 
>> 
>> We are experience some change of behavior, I’m not sure if it is related.
>> 
>> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
>> 
>> Thanks
>> 
>> 
>> Andrew
>> 
>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or 
>> legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or 
>> entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, 
>> you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or 
>> reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
>> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
>> sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
>> 
> 
> 
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential or 
> legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual or 
> entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended recipient, 
> you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or 
> reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be 
> unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender 
> immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies of this message.
> 


-- 
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential 
or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual 
or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, 
please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies 
of this message.

Reply via email to