Hi,
could you maybe post how exactly you specify the window? Also, did you set
a "stream time characteristic", for example EventTime?

That could help us pinpoint the problem.

Cheers,
Aljoscha

On Tue, 9 Aug 2016 at 12:42 Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com> wrote:

> I rolled back to 1.0.3
> If I understand this correctly, the peak when topology starts is because
> it is trying to fill all the buffers, but I can not see that in 1.1.0.
>
>
>
> On 09 Aug 2016, at 12:10, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Which source are you using?
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Robert
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply, I guess I’m one of the early birds.
>> Yes, it is much slower, I’m not sure why, I copied slaves, masters,
>> log4j.properties and flink-conf.yaml directly from 1.0.3
>> I have parallelization 1 on my sources, I can increase that to achieve
>> the same speed, but I’m interested to know why is that.
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> Andrew
>>
>> On 09 Aug 2016, at 11:47, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> here is the release announcement, with a list of all changes:
>> http://flink.apache.org/news/2016/08/08/release-1.1.0.html,
>> http://flink.apache.org/blog/release_1.1.0-changelog.html
>>
>> What does the chart say? Are the results different? is Flink faster or
>> slower now?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Robert
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Andrew Ge Wu <andrew.ge...@eniro.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We found out there is a new stable version released: 1.1.0 but we can
>>> not find any release note.
>>> Do anyone know where to find it?
>>>
>>>
>>> We are experience some change of behavior, I’m not sure if it is related.
>>>
>>> <PastedGraphic-1.png>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain
>>> confidential or legally privileged information that is intended only for
>>> the individual or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the
>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly
>>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error,
>>> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies
>>> of this message.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential
>> or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual
>> or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended
>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
>> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly
>> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error,
>> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies
>> of this message.
>>
>
>
> Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail transmission may contain confidential
> or legally privileged information that is intended only for the individual
> or entity named in the e-mail address. If you are not the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or reliance upon the contents of this e-mail is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete all copies
> of this message.

Reply via email to