Till, Thoughts?
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 7:34 PM vino yang <yanghua1...@gmail.com> wrote: > Your analysis is correct, yes, in theory the old jobgraph should be > deleted, but Flink currently uses the method of locking and asynchronously > deleting Path, so that it can not give you the acknowledgment of deleting, > so this is a risk point. > > cc Till, there have been users who have encountered this problem before. I > personally think that asynchronous deletion may be risky, which may cause > JM to be revived by the cancel job after the failover. >
