Senthil, Have you tried using it recently, with multiple data folders etc. In recent tests, we have seen reasonably good performance. Of course, the performance of MemoryChannel would be much better, since it is in-memory :-). You should try to use the FileChannel as much as you can, else there is a risk of losing data.
Thanks Hari -- Hari Shreedharan On Monday, July 9, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Senthilvel Rangaswamy wrote: > We do use persistent channel when there is overflow. Using FileChannel for > regular operations > is too slow for us. > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Brock Noland <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > I am guessing you are aware, but you could use a persistent channel such as > > file channel. > > > > -- > > Brock Noland > > Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) > > > > > > On Monday, July 9, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Senthilvel Rangaswamy wrote: > > > > > We are using Flume 1.2.0 with memory channel. When we rollout new > > > configs/decorators > > > we may need to restart flume at which point any events in memory channel > > > is gone. Any > > > ways to avoid this ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -- > > > ..Senthil > > > > > > "If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it > > > caught and shot now." > > > - Douglas Adams. > > > > > > > > > -- > ..Senthil > > "If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it > caught and shot now." > - Douglas Adams. >
