Hari, Would you have some numbers around the performance of FileChannel ? Like, how many events you were able to process etc.,
-- ..Senthil On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Hari Shreedharan <[email protected] > wrote: > Senthil, > > Have you tried using it recently, with multiple data folders etc. In > recent tests, we have seen reasonably good performance. Of course, the > performance of MemoryChannel would be much better, since it is in-memory > :-). You should try to use the FileChannel as much as you can, else there > is a risk of losing data. > > Thanks > Hari > > -- > Hari Shreedharan > > On Monday, July 9, 2012 at 12:01 AM, Senthilvel Rangaswamy wrote: > > We do use persistent channel when there is overflow. Using FileChannel for > regular operations > is too slow for us. > > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Brock Noland <[email protected]> wrote: > > I am guessing you are aware, but you could use a persistent channel such > as file channel. > > -- > Brock Noland > Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig> > > On Monday, July 9, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Senthilvel Rangaswamy wrote: > > We are using Flume 1.2.0 with memory channel. When we rollout new > configs/decorators > we may need to restart flume at which point any events in memory channel > is gone. Any > ways to avoid this ? > > Thanks, > -- > ..Senthil > > "If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it > caught and shot now." > - Douglas Adams. > > > > > > -- > ..Senthil > > "If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it > caught and shot now." > - Douglas Adams. > > > -- ..Senthil "If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now." - Douglas Adams.
