Re: Problem at geronimo boot

[Paolo Denti]

Ok Kevan, found. browsing through the sources i see the the ProxyManager interface has changed. the signature of the createProxy methods is the following public Object createProxy(AbstractName target, ClassLoader loader); public Object createProxy(AbstractName target, Class type); now i do not know exactly how to modify the GeronimoTransactionManagerLookup in order to use new ProxyManager. Paolo Denti wrote: the problem is java.lang.NoSuchMethodException: org.apache.geronimo.kernel.proxy.ProxyManager.createProxy(javax.management.ObjectName, java.lang.Class) ?? are the online javadocs correct for the 2.0.1 version ? Paolo Denti wrote: no, never mind ... too many tries and i wrote this "nonsense" stuff ... the clzArray is the parameter list of the createProxyMethod ... it is correct. anyway it fails on the proxyManagerClass.getMethod("createProxy", clzArray) call. Paolo Denti wrote: Kevan, i tried and following the execution, the problem is in the proxyManagerClass.getMethod("createProxy", clzArray); the getMethod call fails. But looking at the javadoc i see that the signature of the ProxyManager createProxy method is Object createProxy(javax.management.ObjectName, Class) but we are inovoking proxyManagerClass.getMethod("createProxy", clzArray) where clzArray is a Class[] as if the signature were Object createProxy(javax.management.ObjectName, Class[]) Kevan Miller wrote: On Aug 28, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Paolo Denti wrote: ok, thanks. therefore the problem "should" lie in how the transactionManager is looked up, that is the method getTransactionManager of the GeronimoTransactionManagerLookup class. Right. Paolo, at a minimum, I think you need to update your GeronimoTransactionManagerLookup class to contain the following setting of TransactionMgrGBeanName:  public static final String TransactionMgrGBeanName="geronimo:J2EEServer=geronimo,ServiceModule=org.apache.geronimo.configs/transaction/2.0.1/car,j2eeType=TransactionManager,name=TransactionManager"; I don't have a working hibernate environment, at the moment. If you could try this new setting, it would be great... --kevan