It would however go counter to the idea of breaking the server up
into a core with independently released plugin sets.
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 28, 2008, at 6:18 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
One suggestion, would be to move the current samples and daytrader
branch back into the server builds. That way, we keep them updated
and release them as part of a server release. Also, it would allow
us to use them as part of the integration testsuite, for hot/
console/cmdline deploy testing.
-Donald
Lin Sun wrote:
That's certainly an excellent idea. I am also looking for some
popular samples that we feel we should get them running on
geronimo as
I think those will be good to show people how to get their apps
working with geronimo.
Lin
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jacek Laskowski
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> One thought is to add more test samples. Seems to me people
are
> trying different things with geronimo server and most of the
stuff
> they tried are not covered by our samples. Any ideas what
other
> samples may be good to work with geronimo?
I think you'd receive more user-focused responses on the user
mailing
list. Its archive is full of possible samples we could/should
cover,
but I don't have anything in my mind right now. I'm sure you'll
find
some there pretty quickly.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
