I am in favor of using some current samples to run more automated testing. I hope it doesn't have to be moved back into the server build, but it can be used after a successful build or as part of a successful build process. More details need to be worked out here and I'll post more info on this once I find out.
Thx, Lin On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:55 AM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would however go counter to the idea of breaking the server up > into a core with independently released plugin sets. > > thanks > david jencks > > > > On Feb 28, 2008, at 6:18 AM, Donald Woods wrote: > > > One suggestion, would be to move the current samples and daytrader > > branch back into the server builds. That way, we keep them updated > > and release them as part of a server release. Also, it would allow > > us to use them as part of the integration testsuite, for hot/ > > console/cmdline deploy testing. > > > > -Donald > > > > Lin Sun wrote: > >> That's certainly an excellent idea. I am also looking for some > >> popular samples that we feel we should get them running on > >> geronimo as > >> I think those will be good to show people how to get their apps > >> working with geronimo. > >> Lin > >> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Jacek Laskowski > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Lin Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > One thought is to add more test samples. Seems to me people > >>> are > >>> > trying different things with geronimo server and most of the > >>> stuff > >>> > they tried are not covered by our samples. Any ideas what > >>> other > >>> > samples may be good to work with geronimo? > >>> > >>> I think you'd receive more user-focused responses on the user > >>> mailing > >>> list. Its archive is full of possible samples we could/should > >>> cover, > >>> but I don't have anything in my mind right now. I'm sure you'll > >>> find > >>> some there pretty quickly. > >>> > >>> Jacek > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jacek Laskowski > >>> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl > >>> > > >
