hdockter wrote:
>
>
> That is what we are currently doing. But the layer is too thin ;) When
> I have created this task, I had just no time to create an option class
> like we do for javac or groovyc. This is very straight forward to do.
>
> - Hans
>
>
I did enter a JIRA for this - I think it's GRADLE-360. I was only asking
for one property to be exposed, but the approach above sounds even better.
Whenever it's available I'll give it a try against HEAD.
Thanks
Allan
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Javadoc-issue-tp21402345p21482215.html
Sent from the gradle-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
