On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 08:02 +0000, Peter Ledbrook wrote: > > I thought this was perfectly reasonable as well. the whole reasons why > > the key is urls and not url is that you can provide a list of URLs or a > > single one. > > A list of URLs has a special meaning: the first entry is the > repository containing the POM, while the rest of the URLs are used to > find the corresponding JAR.
I didn't know that. As the saying goes "you learn something new every
day"!
> I would much prefer to have a "url" argument that takes a single URL,
> and "pomUrl"/"jarUrls" arguments for the situation where POMs and JARs
> are in separate repositories.
Given the above semantics, the current key naming and structure is
seemingly very misleading.
--
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder Partner
xmpp: [email protected]
Concertant LLP t: +44 20 7585 2200, +44 20 7193 9203
41 Buckmaster Road, f: +44 8700 516 084 voip: sip:[email protected]
London SW11 1EN, UK m: +44 7770 465 077 skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
