Ah, I'll stick with the slightly more verbose solution then; I'll give the sugar another try when 0.9 is released. Thanks for the insight.
Op 16 jul. 2010 om 17:01 heeft John Murph <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:05 AM, Levi Hoogenberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > Hello, > > I've just upgradled my build file to 0.9-preview-3 and I ran into some > problems with the copy spec's from method. I've got a working build again, > but it would be nice if someone could answer the following questions: > Should > > from(someDir).include('**/*.java') > > have the same effect as > > from(someDir) { > include '**/*.java' > } > > ? (For me it doesn't, so I'm sticking to the second form ATM.) > > We have noticed some problems with preview 3 and using the fluent style > interfaces for copy. We don't understand what is going on yet, but Steve has > been looking into it (in between meetings and vacation and such). The second > form is a workaround until this problem is identified and fixed (I'm pretty > sure 0.9 final will have a fix for this). > > When building an archive, should it be possible to use from(someDir) without > any configuration? This works for my source zip files, but not for my > project's distribution (in the latter case, nothing gets added to the zip > file until I add include '**'). > I thought that I had a third question, but I can't seem to remember it. Oh > well. > Thanks in advance, > Levi > > > > -- > John Murph > Automated Logic Research Team
