On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]>wrote:

> Right now you can't get 0.90 from CDH3. It is an 0.89-<mumble>. It will not
> be a better choice than 0.90 once 0.90 is released.
>
> We are looking at deploying CDH3B3 plus a custom RPM built in house that
> updates the CDH3B3 HBase package to 0.90.
>
>
Once 0.90 is released, we plan on spending a week or two to suss out any
possible integration issues, and then release CDH3b4 including 0.90.

Right now I believe the version in CDH3b3 is more stable than the 0.90rc.
This is from the testing I've done in-house with our clusters - assignment
issues cropped up in 0.90 which I haven't seen in 0.89.20100924. The next rc
or 0.90.0 should be better, and then we'll update CDH as well.


> I'm not sure we forgo support for our ops team just because we do that. I
> can't comment as an authority on Cloudera's business of course since I do
> not work from them, but as a customer I expect by the letter of the contract
> we cannot (and would not anyway) ask for support for HBase if using a custom
> version, but e.g. any HDFS related trouble is independent and we would be
> very unhappy if told otherwise.
>

Not going to go into specifics of our contracts on a list like this ;-) But
as an engineer I'm always happy to try to help other engineers if they can
explain their problem well - it increases the quality of the software for
everyone, and really isn't that what we're all here for?

-Todd


>
> --- On Mon, 11/22/10, Michael Segel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: Michael Segel <[email protected]>
> > Subject: RE: which HBase version to use?
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Monday, November 22, 2010, 9:15 AM
> >
> > Friso,
> >
> > I don't disagree with Ryan, however, I think you have to
> > determine which makes the most sense.
> >
> > Going with CDH3 you get the RPMs, and you know that
> > everything in CDH3 works together.
> > Essentially one stop shopping and you can purchase
> > production support.
> >
> > If you're looking at a pure Dev cluster, maybe mixing and
> > matching makes sense.
> >
> > If you are going to go with CDH3, skip b2 and go with b3.
> > HBase is more stable.
> > If you're going to use HBase from ASF, then why not also
> > get everything from ASF?
> >
> > The reason we chose Cloudera (not that I'm giving them a
> > free plug. :-) is that Cloudera sells support which is
> > something my client wanted from the start.
> > If you are going to go w Cloudera, they support HBase in
> > CDH3 and you don't want to use ASF because it could violate
> > your support contract.
> >
> > HTH
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 01:24:30 -0800
> > > Subject: Re: which HBase version to use?
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > To: [email protected]
> > >
> > > I have to recommend ASF 0.90, which is in release
> > candidate mode right
> > > now.  You'll want to run it on top of CDH3 b2 or
> > b3, but that is up to
> > > you to decide.  The hbase team here at
> > Stumbleupon has more time in on
> > > b2.
> > >
> > > -ryan
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Friso van
> > Vollenhoven
> > > <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > > Hi list,
> > > >
> > > > I have the opportunity to reinstall a cluster
> > form scratch. I use Hadoop and HBase (not yet any of the
> > other tools, like Pig, Hive, Avro, Thrift, etc.). Now, I
> > wonder what versions to use. CDH3 is nice, because it comes
> > with RPMs out of the box, so the operations people now what
> > to do with it (of course, we can build our own for versions
> > that don't have RPMs). It does appear, however, that CDH is
> > mostly focused on a very good Hadoop / HDFS / MR version and
> > you're better of with the ASF HBase release right now. And
> > there is also the version that SU provides on githug, which
> > has the advantage of being heavily used in a production
> > environment by people who know what they're doing.
> > > >
> > > > Any advise on this anyone?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Friso
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Reply via email to