Hi All, Thanks for all the feedback. Because I need a 'works right now' version, I am going to go for 0.89-<somtehing> with some patches applied (basically SU's version on top of CDH3b3 Hadoop), with a planned upgrade path to CDH3 when it reaches b4 or final (or any state that I have time for to test on our dev boxes).
Thanks Friso On 23 nov 2010, at 02:30, Todd Lipcon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> On Mon, 11/22/10, Todd Lipcon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Once 0.90 is released, we plan on spending a week or two to suss >>> out any possible integration issues, and then release CDH3b4 >>> including 0.90. >> >> I'm sure that will make everyone happy. :-) Glad to hear the projected time >> between releases will be short. That was my concern. >> >> > Yes, a reasonably stable HBase 0.90 is one of the primary gating functions > for the next beta. The qualification of "reasonably stable" is sometimes > hard to quantify, but in general my rubric has been to run a small test > cluster under heavy load for 24+ hours with a configuration that stresses > splits, compactions, and flushes, and occasionally kill -9 one of the nodes. > > -Todd > -- > Todd Lipcon > Software Engineer, Cloudera
