I read something somewhere that had performance using a self-created index(with either lily or the tableindex or something) and it has some numbers in there. I was trying to redig that up since we are looking at in-memory datagrid technology and I figured we could just use hbase instead. (we do a lot of batch at night plus real time querying/updating during the day). I remember it was in ms even though it was using the index(one table lookup) and then getting the data from the main table. Any links to that?
I see Lily's perf. Numbers but throughput can be different than one single io operation(ie. I can have 7000 operations all take 800ms and still meet 7000/second like he had in the paper. (I suspect of course that is not the case based on what I read previously). Thanks, Dean This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system.
