You should check like below http://blog.rajeevsharma.in/2009/06/secondary-indexes-in-hbase.html
source samples https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel <http://blog.rajeevsharma.in/2009/06/secondary-indexes-in-hbase.html>This might be help you. 2011/1/12 Hiller, Dean (Contractor) <[email protected]> > I read something somewhere that had performance using a self-created > index(with either lily or the tableindex or something) and it has some > numbers in there. I was trying to redig that up since we are looking at > in-memory datagrid technology and I figured we could just use hbase > instead. (we do a lot of batch at night plus real time > querying/updating during the day). I remember it was in ms even though > it was using the index(one table lookup) and then getting the data from > the main table. Any links to that? > > > > I see Lily's perf. Numbers but throughput can be different than one > single io operation(ie. I can have 7000 operations all take 800ms and > still meet 7000/second like he had in the paper. (I suspect of course > that is not the case based on what I read previously). > > > > Thanks, > > Dean > > > > > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the > addressee and > may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader > of the > message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of > the > intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this > communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > communication in > error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and > any > attachments from your system. > >
