Hi Hari,
I'm just beginning with hbase and can't give any feedback on potential
impact.
I had bookmarked http://markmail.org/message/bx2nsg7m4dser6yx post where
the conclusion was not crystal clear to me.
It seems a recurring and complicated topic on ml, but I hope hbase will
soon rely on a standard hadoop distribution.
Tks,
- Eric
On 5/04/2011 18:30, Hari Sreekumar wrote:
Hey Eric,
Sorry, but do you mean there are side effects or there are no side effects?
Actually we are doing something similar here so I'd like to know if there
are any downsides to that approach.
Thanks,
Hari
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Eric Charles<[email protected]>wrote:
On 5/04/2011 10:34, 陈加俊 wrote:
another questiion: which version is uesed in hbase0.90.2 ?
I just downloaded hbase 0.90.2 from
http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.90.2-candidate-0/.
It ships with hadoop-core-0.20-append-r1056497.jar, exactly the same as in
hbase 0.90.1.
For the record and ease (even if it's not the formal way to go), I run
hbase 0.90-1 on hadoop-0.20.2 from apache where I replaced the
hadoop-0.20.2-core.jar with the hadoop-core-0.20-append-r1056497.jar.
It has been previously discussed on this ml, and confirmed that there's not
guarantee on potential side-effects...
Tks,
- Eric
