I added the suggestion made in the cited mail message to http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop The practise seems to work for me in my basic tests. St.Ack
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Eric Charles <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Hari, > > I'm just beginning with hbase and can't give any feedback on potential > impact. > > I had bookmarked http://markmail.org/message/bx2nsg7m4dser6yx post where the > conclusion was not crystal clear to me. > > It seems a recurring and complicated topic on ml, but I hope hbase will soon > rely on a standard hadoop distribution. > > Tks, > - Eric > > > On 5/04/2011 18:30, Hari Sreekumar wrote: >> >> Hey Eric, >> >> Sorry, but do you mean there are side effects or there are no side >> effects? >> Actually we are doing something similar here so I'd like to know if there >> are any downsides to that approach. >> >> Thanks, >> Hari >> >> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Eric >> Charles<[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> On 5/04/2011 10:34, 陈加俊 wrote: >>> >>>> another questiion: which version is uesed in hbase0.90.2 ? >>>> >>> >>> I just downloaded hbase 0.90.2 from >>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.90.2-candidate-0/. >>> >>> It ships with hadoop-core-0.20-append-r1056497.jar, exactly the same as >>> in >>> hbase 0.90.1. >>> >>> For the record and ease (even if it's not the formal way to go), I run >>> hbase 0.90-1 on hadoop-0.20.2 from apache where I replaced the >>> hadoop-0.20.2-core.jar with the hadoop-core-0.20-append-r1056497.jar. >>> It has been previously discussed on this ml, and confirmed that there's >>> not >>> guarantee on potential side-effects... >>> >>> Tks, >>> - Eric >>> >> >
