Wei, Yes, its definitely on the roadmap to release a version with those in the near future. You can ask for more information on the hdfs-user lists perhaps.
For now, people run 0.20-append or CDH (which is essentially append+security+0.20.2 if you look at its backports, nothing proprietary or closed source) in production without issues. On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Wei Shung Chung <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the plan down the road? Would Hadoop incorporate the append/durable > sync feature in the future release ? > > Thank you > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 31, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Harsh J <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Wei, >> >> That is correct. You can go either way to get the right HDFS version for >> HBase. The docs @ http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop speak the same. >> >> On 31-Aug-2011, at 10:01 PM, Wei Shung Chung wrote: >> >>> It looks like I have to build a Hadoop version from the append branch or >>> just use the cloudera CDH3. Correct me if I'm wrong. >>> Thank u >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Aug 31, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop It explicilty calls out >>>> 203 as a version you should not run hbase against, not unless you are >>>> fine losing data. >>>> St.Ack >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Wei Shung Chung <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> Is HBase 0.90.4 compatible with Hadoop 0.20.203 ? >>>>> Thank you >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >> > -- Harsh J
