Thank u it's good to know :) Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 31, 2011, at 12:17 PM, Harsh J <[email protected]> wrote: > Wei, > > Yes, its definitely on the roadmap to release a version with those in > the near future. You can ask for more information on the hdfs-user > lists perhaps. > > For now, people run 0.20-append or CDH (which is essentially > append+security+0.20.2 if you look at its backports, nothing > proprietary or closed source) in production without issues. > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Wei Shung Chung <[email protected]> wrote: >> What is the plan down the road? Would Hadoop incorporate the append/durable >> sync feature in the future release ? >> >> Thank you >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Aug 31, 2011, at 11:44 AM, Harsh J <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Wei, >>> >>> That is correct. You can go either way to get the right HDFS version for >>> HBase. The docs @ http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop speak the same. >>> >>> On 31-Aug-2011, at 10:01 PM, Wei Shung Chung wrote: >>> >>>> It looks like I have to build a Hadoop version from the append branch or >>>> just use the cloudera CDH3. Correct me if I'm wrong. >>>> Thank u >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>> On Aug 31, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> See http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hadoop It explicilty calls out >>>>> 203 as a version you should not run hbase against, not unless you are >>>>> fine losing data. >>>>> St.Ack >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Wei Shung Chung <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Is HBase 0.90.4 compatible with Hadoop 0.20.203 ? >>>>>> Thank you >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>> >>> >> > > > > -- > Harsh J
