Can you please attach the output of hbck -details and the output of hadoop fs -lsr /hbase(you can send directly if you do not want to share that)? There should not be any problem with using the uber-hbck to resolve this from the .90.6 version.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Suraj Varma <[email protected]> wrote: > I was about to propose that next ... you could just try back porting > that uber hbck (or the relevant portions) and run the patched ruby > script ... I've done this for like online meta table merges ... but > not with hbck. > > So - yes, that might be your solve. Good luck! > --S > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Bryan Beaudreault > <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm on cdh3u2 to be precise. I don't have the fixMeta option, or any > other > > special fix options aside from the basic -fix. > > > > I'll take a look at what 0.90.6 version does when it fixes meta. Maybe I > > can just follow what it does there. > > > > Thanks again! > > > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Suraj Varma <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Are you using apache hbase 0.90.4 ... or the one from CDH3? > >> Check what other hbck options you have (do you have -fixMeta?) on the > >> version you are on. > >> > >> What the uber-hbck (part of hbase-0.90.6 and later releases) does is > >> "automate" this meta table surgery to fix the issue. > >> > >> I will let folks who have tried other repair options respond to you. > >> --S > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Bryan Beaudreault > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Thanks for the response. > >> > > >> > hbck consistently shows 7 inconsistencies. I tried -fix (a few times) > >> and > >> > it didn't seem to fix it. I tried -details and it does seem to print > out > >> > more, but nothing super usable from what I can tell. > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Suraj Varma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Try doing an hbase hbck to see if it reports inconsistency. And do an > >> >> hbase hbck -fix to see if it fixes it for you. See > >> >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbck.in.depth > >> >> > >> >> Note that since 0.90.4 is old, some of the documented options won't > be > >> >> available ... but hbase hbck -fix will be available. > >> >> --S > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Bryan Beaudreault > >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > Hey all, > >> >> > > >> >> > I'm running hbase 0.90.4, and somehow the regions for one of my > tables > >> >> have > >> >> > become unlinked from the table itself. The Master UI shows no > regions > >> >> for > >> >> > the table, and attempting to call Table.getRegionsInfo() returns > >> nothing. > >> >> > However, I can see the regions in hdfs in their proper location > and > >> >> doing > >> >> > a scan of the table via the hbase shell does return results. I > also > >> get > >> >> > results if I do a Get for a specific rowkey. > >> >> > > >> >> > How can I get these regions back associated with the table, and any > >> idea > >> >> > why this may have happened? I tried grepping the hmaster logs but > >> didn't > >> >> > see anything relevant. > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks! > >> >> > > >> >> > Bryan > >> >> > >> > -- Kevin O'Dell Customer Operations Engineer, Cloudera
