Bryan, I forgot to add the link to the new code to grab the uber-hbck http://archive.cloudera.com/cdh/3/hbase-0.90.6-cdh3u4.tar.gz
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Kevin O'dell <[email protected]>wrote: > Can you please attach the output of hbck -details and the output of hadoop > fs -lsr /hbase(you can send directly if you do not want to share that)? > There should not be any problem with using the uber-hbck to resolve this > from the .90.6 version. > > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Suraj Varma <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I was about to propose that next ... you could just try back porting >> that uber hbck (or the relevant portions) and run the patched ruby >> script ... I've done this for like online meta table merges ... but >> not with hbck. >> >> So - yes, that might be your solve. Good luck! >> --S >> >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Bryan Beaudreault >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I'm on cdh3u2 to be precise. I don't have the fixMeta option, or any >> other >> > special fix options aside from the basic -fix. >> > >> > I'll take a look at what 0.90.6 version does when it fixes meta. Maybe >> I >> > can just follow what it does there. >> > >> > Thanks again! >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Suraj Varma <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Are you using apache hbase 0.90.4 ... or the one from CDH3? >> >> Check what other hbck options you have (do you have -fixMeta?) on the >> >> version you are on. >> >> >> >> What the uber-hbck (part of hbase-0.90.6 and later releases) does is >> >> "automate" this meta table surgery to fix the issue. >> >> >> >> I will let folks who have tried other repair options respond to you. >> >> --S >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Bryan Beaudreault >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Thanks for the response. >> >> > >> >> > hbck consistently shows 7 inconsistencies. I tried -fix (a few >> times) >> >> and >> >> > it didn't seem to fix it. I tried -details and it does seem to >> print out >> >> > more, but nothing super usable from what I can tell. >> >> > >> >> > On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Suraj Varma <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Try doing an hbase hbck to see if it reports inconsistency. And do >> an >> >> >> hbase hbck -fix to see if it fixes it for you. See >> >> >> http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#hbck.in.depth >> >> >> >> >> >> Note that since 0.90.4 is old, some of the documented options won't >> be >> >> >> available ... but hbase hbck -fix will be available. >> >> >> --S >> >> >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:34 AM, Bryan Beaudreault >> >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> > Hey all, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I'm running hbase 0.90.4, and somehow the regions for one of my >> tables >> >> >> have >> >> >> > become unlinked from the table itself. The Master UI shows no >> regions >> >> >> for >> >> >> > the table, and attempting to call Table.getRegionsInfo() returns >> >> nothing. >> >> >> > However, I can see the regions in hdfs in their proper location >> and >> >> >> doing >> >> >> > a scan of the table via the hbase shell does return results. I >> also >> >> get >> >> >> > results if I do a Get for a specific rowkey. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > How can I get these regions back associated with the table, and >> any >> >> idea >> >> >> > why this may have happened? I tried grepping the hmaster logs but >> >> didn't >> >> >> > see anything relevant. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Bryan >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Kevin O'Dell > Customer Operations Engineer, Cloudera > -- Kevin O'Dell Customer Operations Engineer, Cloudera
