Andrew - thanks for the quick response! Jason
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > The issue with the patch on HBASE-3529 is it relies on modifications > to HDFS that the author of HBASE-3529 proposed to the HDFS project as > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2004. The proposal was > vetoed. Therefore, further progress on HBASE-3529 as currently > implemented is not possible. > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Jason Huang <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am interested in learning the possibility of integrating Lucene & >> HBase. Google search points me to HBASE-3529 (Add search to HBase). >> >> This project is currently listed as "patch available" but >> "unresolved". Does that mean there are reported bugs in the patch that >> haven't been resolved yet? It appears that no one has actively worked >> on this project for a while. Does anyone in this mail list know the >> most recent status? >> >> thanks! >> >> Jason > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein (via Tom White)
