On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> wrote: > But, what stopped progress here is a veto of HDFS side changes needed for > the implementation to get that performance. >
We could have another go and even do it ourselves if enough of us thought it worth it. > If we're just >> rebuilding ElasticSearch, wouldn't a simple Coprocessor connector that >> managed communication with ES be simpler and more performant? > Why have your data in two places if you could avoid it? St.Ack
