I am also agree with Ram. Not a reason to fail RC Downloaded the src and built. Verified signtaure. Ran the ITs for visibility. Done some random shell ops. All looks good
+1 -Anoop- On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:37 PM, ramkrishna vasudevan < [email protected]> wrote: > Downloaded the src compiled and built it. Ran all tests. > > Ran all ITs and found that IntegrationTestIngestWithVisibilityLabels > fails. Anoop raised a JIRA for the same. > All other ITs with ACLs work fine. > > +1 on the RC except for the IT. I don't think it needs to fail an RC. > > Regards > Ram > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Anoop John <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Running the IT IntegrationTestIngestWithVisibilityLabels fails. This > is > > because we are not handling the Deletes in > > LoadTestDataGeneratorWithVisibilityLabels. > > As it is an issue only with IT test and no code level issues, you can > take > > a call Andy. I have raised HBASE-11716 and attached a simple patch. > > > > -Anoop- > > > > On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:33 AM, Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > This is PE, so perhaps HBASE-11558 is operative. Or if you are running > > the > > > test against a minicluster, perhaps HBASE-11621 > > > > > > Unfortunately I'm not set up yet for the small cluster YCSB tests I've > > run > > > for previous 0.98 RCs. Next time. Any help providing insight as to > perf > > > changes in this release to the previous would be much appreciated J-M, > > even > > > if they come in after the release. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari < > > > [email protected] > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > > > Are you excepting big performances improvement for this release? I > see > > > > pretty big improvements for the following tests: > > > > RandomScanWithRange1000Test SequentialReadTest > > > > I will now run YCSB but I'm wondering if I need to re-run the 2 tests > > > above > > > > or if this is expected... > > > > > > > > JM > > > > > > > > > > > > 2014-08-08 14:37 GMT-04:00 lars hofhansl <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > - installed -hadoop2 bin tar ball > > > > > - checked contents, documentation, checksums, etc > > > > > - inserted some data, checked with raw-scans, flushed, compacted, > > > > inserted > > > > > again, checked again. All good. > > > > > - downloaded source tarball, checked contents, CHANGES.txt, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Lars > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > > From: Andrew Purtell <[email protected]> > > > > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > > > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 12:19 AM > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] The 1st HBase 0.98.5 release candidate (RC0) is > > > > available, > > > > > vote closing 8/11/2014 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The 1st HBase 0.98.5 release candidate (RC0) is available for > > > download > > > > > at http://people.apache.org/~apurtell/0.98.5RC0/ and Maven > > artifacts > > > > are > > > > > also available in the temporary repository > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehbase-1027/ > > > > > > > > > > Signed with my code signing key D5365CCD. > > > > > > > > > > The issues resolved in this release can be found here: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310753&version=12326953 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific > Time > > > > (00:00 > > > > > -0800 GMT) on August 11 on whether or not we should release > this > > as > > > > > 0.98.5. Three +1 votes from PMC will be required to > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Best regards, > > > > > > - Andy > > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > > > (via Tom White) > > > > > >
