>From Connection, you can call:
public RegionLocator getRegionLocator(TableName tableName) throws
IOException;
RegionLocator has this method:
public HRegionLocation getRegionLocation(final byte [] row) throws
IOException;
HRegionLocation has:
public HRegionInfo getRegionInfo(){
return regionInfo;
However, HRegion is on server side.
FYI
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Yakubovich, Alexey <
alexey.yakubov...@searshc.com> wrote:
> Great, it looks as exactly what I need. Thank you very much.
> If only I new how to get HRegion object for my row and table. I can get
> HRegionLocation,HRegionInfo, but … how to get an HRegion object instance
> for the given HTable and row…
>
>
>
>
> On 1/26/16, 1:05 PM, "Ted Yu" <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >bq. can you completely customize
> >
> >Please take a look at HRegion#checkAndMutate() - you would get better
> >idea.
> >
> >FYI
> >
> >On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Yakubovich, Alexey <
> >alexey.yakubov...@searshc.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Actually a found another question (HBase : Check and Put method used
> >>with
> >> a long). That is also my question. I mean by design, can you use in
> >> checkAndPut with CompareFilter.CompareOp to conditionally update (in my
> >> case, with CompareFilter.CompareOp.GREATER enum value) for int? Or even
> >> better, can you completely customize (within reasonable restrictions))
> >>the
> >> condition for the atomic update?
> >>
> >> On 1/26/16, 9:52 AM, "Ted Yu" <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >As long as C1 and C2 are updated using one checkAndPut() call, it
> >>should
> >> >work.
> >> >
> >> >On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Yakubovich, Alexey <
> >> >alexey.yakubov...@searshc.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Thank you Ted.
> >> >> You are right it should works. Concerning condition when it can be
> >> >> necessary: one case is when several (spark) executors can update the
> >> >>same
> >> >> row with two int cells: C1 and C2, representing a range. Then C1
> >>Should
> >> >>be
> >> >> always <= C2. But without synch between executors, the data integrity
> >> >>can
> >> >> be broken.
> >> >> Thanks again
> >> >>
> >> >> + something), and data integrity for instance require
> >> >> On 1/25/16, 3:02 PM, "Ted Yu" <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >bq. what if I want to update two cells (from one row) in one atomic
> >> >> >operation
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Can you clarify the condition on which the update should be
> >>performed ?
> >> >> >Meaning, do you want to compare with one column or compare with two
> >> >> >columns
> >> >> >?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >If you want to compare with one column and update the row depending
> >>on
> >> >> >result of the comparison, you can call addColumn() of Put twice (for
> >> >>the
> >> >> >two columns, respectively) and pass the Put to checkAndPut().
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Cheers
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Yakubovich, Alexey <
> >> >> >alexey.yakubov...@searshc.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I am trying to master HBase, and vuala, I discover that so nice
> >>API
> >> >> >> components:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> checkAndPut, checkAndDelete, Increment, Append (HTable)
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Or may be not so nice? So e.g. checkAndPut can atomically update
> >>the
> >> >> >> specified cell.
> >> >> >> But what if I want to update two cells (from one row) in one
> >>atomic
> >> >> >> operation? What if it易s two cells from two different rows, but in
> >> >>need
> >> >> >>to
> >> >> >> be updated atomically?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> What is the best way to achieve that?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thank you
> >> >> >> Alexey
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears
> >> >> >>Holdings
> >> >> >> Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and
> >> >>may
> >> >> >> contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are
> >>not
> >> >> >>the
> >> >> >> intended recipient, please delete it without reading the contents.
> >> >>Thank
> >> >> >> you.
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears
> >> >>Holdings
> >> >> Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and
> >>may
> >> >> contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not
> >> >>the
> >> >> intended recipient, please delete it without reading the contents.
> >>Thank
> >> >> you.
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears
> >>Holdings
> >> Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and may
> >> contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not
> >>the
> >> intended recipient, please delete it without reading the contents. Thank
> >> you.
> >>
>
> This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears Holdings
> Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and may
> contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please delete it without reading the contents. Thank
> you.
>
