bq. I still can do with with coprocessor
Please take a look at the following methods in BaseRegionObserver:
public boolean preCheckAndPut(final
ObserverContext<RegionCoprocessorEnvironment> e,
public boolean preCheckAndPutAfterRowLock(
FYI
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:52 PM, Yakubovich, Alexey <
alexey.yakubov...@searshc.com> wrote:
> Thank you. But what is the meaning of “HRegion is on server side”? Does it
> means that I can’t obtain the instance of HRegion in my java client
> program and so I can’t use the method checkAndMutate with comparator?
> Or may be I still can do with with coprocessor?
>
> On 1/26/16, 2:51 PM, "Ted Yu" <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >From Connection, you can call:
> >
> > public RegionLocator getRegionLocator(TableName tableName) throws
> >IOException;
> >
> >RegionLocator has this method:
> >
> > public HRegionLocation getRegionLocation(final byte [] row) throws
> >IOException;
> >
> >HRegionLocation has:
> >
> > public HRegionInfo getRegionInfo(){
> >
> > return regionInfo;
> >
> >
> >However, HRegion is on server side.
> >
> >
> >FYI
> >
> >On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Yakubovich, Alexey <
> >alexey.yakubov...@searshc.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Great, it looks as exactly what I need. Thank you very much.
> >> If only I new how to get HRegion object for my row and table. I can get
> >> HRegionLocation,HRegionInfo, but … how to get an HRegion object instance
> >> for the given HTable and row…
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/26/16, 1:05 PM, "Ted Yu" <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >bq. can you completely customize
> >> >
> >> >Please take a look at HRegion#checkAndMutate() - you would get better
> >> >idea.
> >> >
> >> >FYI
> >> >
> >> >On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Yakubovich, Alexey <
> >> >alexey.yakubov...@searshc.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Actually a found another question (HBase : Check and Put method used
> >> >>with
> >> >> a long). That is also my question. I mean by design, can you use in
> >> >> checkAndPut with CompareFilter.CompareOp to conditionally update (in
> >>my
> >> >> case, with CompareFilter.CompareOp.GREATER enum value) for int? Or
> >>even
> >> >> better, can you completely customize (within reasonable
> >>restrictions))
> >> >>the
> >> >> condition for the atomic update?
> >> >>
> >> >> On 1/26/16, 9:52 AM, "Ted Yu" <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >As long as C1 and C2 are updated using one checkAndPut() call, it
> >> >>should
> >> >> >work.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Yakubovich, Alexey <
> >> >> >alexey.yakubov...@searshc.com> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Thank you Ted.
> >> >> >> You are right it should works. Concerning condition when it can be
> >> >> >> necessary: one case is when several (spark) executors can update
> >>the
> >> >> >>same
> >> >> >> row with two int cells: C1 and C2, representing a range. Then C1
> >> >>Should
> >> >> >>be
> >> >> >> always <= C2. But without synch between executors, the data
> >>integrity
> >> >> >>can
> >> >> >> be broken.
> >> >> >> Thanks again
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> + something), and data integrity for instance require
> >> >> >> On 1/25/16, 3:02 PM, "Ted Yu" <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >bq. what if I want to update two cells (from one row) in one
> >>atomic
> >> >> >> >operation
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Can you clarify the condition on which the update should be
> >> >>performed ?
> >> >> >> >Meaning, do you want to compare with one column or compare with
> >>two
> >> >> >> >columns
> >> >> >> >?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >If you want to compare with one column and update the row
> >>depending
> >> >>on
> >> >> >> >result of the comparison, you can call addColumn() of Put twice
> >>(for
> >> >> >>the
> >> >> >> >two columns, respectively) and pass the Put to checkAndPut().
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Cheers
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Yakubovich, Alexey <
> >> >> >> >alexey.yakubov...@searshc.com> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> I am trying to master HBase, and vuala, I discover that so nice
> >> >>API
> >> >> >> >> components:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> checkAndPut, checkAndDelete, Increment, Append (HTable)
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Or may be not so nice? So e.g. checkAndPut can atomically
> >>update
> >> >>the
> >> >> >> >> specified cell.
> >> >> >> >> But what if I want to update two cells (from one row) in one
> >> >>atomic
> >> >> >> >> operation? What if it易s two cells from two different rows, but
> >>in
> >> >> >>need
> >> >> >> >>to
> >> >> >> >> be updated atomically?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> What is the best way to achieve that?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Thank you
> >> >> >> >> Alexey
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> This message, including any attachments, is the property of
> >>Sears
> >> >> >> >>Holdings
> >> >> >> >> Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential
> >>and
> >> >> >>may
> >> >> >> >> contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you
> >>are
> >> >>not
> >> >> >> >>the
> >> >> >> >> intended recipient, please delete it without reading the
> >>contents.
> >> >> >>Thank
> >> >> >> >> you.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears
> >> >> >>Holdings
> >> >> >> Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and
> >> >>may
> >> >> >> contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are
> >>not
> >> >> >>the
> >> >> >> intended recipient, please delete it without reading the contents.
> >> >>Thank
> >> >> >> you.
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears
> >> >>Holdings
> >> >> Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and
> >>may
> >> >> contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not
> >> >>the
> >> >> intended recipient, please delete it without reading the contents.
> >>Thank
> >> >> you.
> >> >>
> >>
> >> This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears
> >>Holdings
> >> Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and may
> >> contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not
> >>the
> >> intended recipient, please delete it without reading the contents. Thank
> >> you.
>
> This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears Holdings
> Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and may
> contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please delete it without reading the contents. Thank
> you.
>
