Can you come up with unit test that shows what you observed ? You may have seen the javadoc for ClientSideRegionScanner :
* A client scanner for a region opened for read-only on the client side. Assumes region data * is not changing. Cheers On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Randy Fox <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have attempted to parallelize the TableSnapshotScanner by taking the > ClientSideRegionScanner’s it generates and sending them each to their own > thread to read the results. I am finding that I do not get all the rows > per region when I do this. It seems the more parallelism the less data I > get back. Any ideas on why these scanners cannot be accessed in parallel? > > Thanks in advance, > > Randy >
