I can work on that. Since it is reading the restore data from a snapshot it is definitely not changing. I wanted to make sure there was not some inherent thread model under the scanner that prohibited this from working.
On 10/20/16, 8:30 AM, "Ted Yu" <[email protected]> wrote: >Can you come up with unit test that shows what you observed ? >You may have seen the javadoc for ClientSideRegionScanner : > > * A client scanner for a region opened for read-only on the client side. >Assumes region data > > * is not changing. > >Cheers > >On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 8:26 AM, Randy Fox <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have attempted to parallelize the TableSnapshotScanner by taking the >> ClientSideRegionScanner’s it generates and sending them each to their own >> thread to read the results. I am finding that I do not get all the rows >> per region when I do this. It seems the more parallelism the less data I >> get back. Any ideas on why these scanners cannot be accessed in parallel? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Randy >>
