Thanks for the feedback. I'll use the deprecated constructors for now, and I've
filedhttps://jira.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-22841 (and also submitted a PR
for it).
Huon
On 6/8/19, 7:23 pm, "Anoop John" <anoop.hb...@gmail.com> wrote:
We might need a static creator method which takes start and end time in TR?
Anoop
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 9:11 AM OpenInx <open...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
> I've checked the code, I think you can use the deprecated TimeRange(ts+1)
> first, also the methods defined in TimeRange
> is not good enough now, we may need to create an issue to address this
> thing.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 10:15 AM Wilson, Huon (Data61, Eveleigh) <
> huon.wil...@data61.csiro.au> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I’m trying to do an atomic read-modify-write where a cell is read and
> then
> > rewritten with an updated value (updated in a complicated way, more than
> > just incrementing), but only if there’s been no writes since it was
read,
> > otherwise try again from the read.
> >
> > My plan is to use something like
> >
> > table.checkAndMutate(row, family).qualifier(qualifier).timeRange(new
> > TimeRange(ts + 1)).ifNotExists().put(put)
> >
> > to insert if the cell row/family/qualifier doesn't exist in the range
> `[ts
> > + 1, infinity)`, which I think means no writes after time `ts`. However,
> > that TimeRange constructor is @Deprecated and @Private, and the only
> > remaining ways to publicly construct a TimeRange is
> `TimeRange.allTime()`
> > ([0, infinity)) and `TimeRange.at(long ts)` ([ts, ts + 1)), neither of
> > which are right.
> >
> > Is there a way to create this time range, or another way to achieve this
> > RMW operation?
> >
> > An alternative is to do a value comparison with `.ifEquals(...)` but my
> > values could be quite large (kilobytes), so I was thinking this range
> > comparison would be better.
> >
> > ---
> > Huon Wilson
> > CSIRO | Data61
> > https://www.data61.csiro.au
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
