Hi,

How many MatchingJobs do you submit?


On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 12:29 PM, 胡永亮/Bob <hu...@neusoft.com> wrote:

> Hello,  Vladislav <vldpyat...@gmail.com>
>
>     The following is some code.
>
>     ...
>     IgniteCompute compute = ignite.compute();//.withAsync();
>
>     compute.run(new MatchingJob(m_mapReadyDataPara));
>     }
>
> private static class MatchingJob implements IgniteRunnable{
>
>     private Map<String, Map<Long, std>> m_mapReadyData;
>     private IgniteCache<String, Map<Long, List<baselink>>> mapMatchingData;
> *//This is a cache in Ignite cluster.*
>     ...
>
>     public void run() {
>     ...
>     Iterator<Entry<String, Map<Long, std>>> entryKeyIterator1 = m_
> mapReadyData.entrySet().iterator();    *//**m_mapReadyData is the input
> data, its size is 5000 for every job now.*
>     Map<String, Map<Long, List<baselink>>> local_writeCache =
>  new HashMap<String, Map<Long, List<baselink>>>();
>     ...
>     *//Then the job read detail data from m_mapReadyData, and compute.*
>     while (entryKeyIterator1.hasNext()) {
>                 Entry<String, Map<Long, std>> eKey1 =
> entryKeyIterator1.next();
>                 String carKey = eKey1.getKey();
>                 Map<Long, std> value1 = eKey1.getValue();
>
> *                //local node cache*
>                 Map<Long, List<baselink>> existMapbaselink = local_
> mapMatchingData.get(carKey);
>                 if(existMapbaselink == null){
>                     existMapbaselink = mapMatchingData.get(carKey); * //Read
> data to compute with it from Ignite cache. This data's size is 154M for *
> PARTITIONED *mode.*
>                     if(existMapbaselink != null)
>                         local_mapMatchingData.putIfAbsent(
> carKey, existMapbaselink);
>                 }
>
>                * //some compute logic code*
>
>                 mapbaselink = local_writeCache.get(carKey);
>                 if(mapbaselink == null){
>                     mapbaselink = new TreeMap<Long, List<baselink>>();
>                 }
>                 mapbaselink.put(stdtime, ListBaseLink);
>                 local_writeCache.put(carKey, mapbaselink);
>     }
>
>             *//batch to write data into Ignite.*
>             Iterator<Entry<String, Map<Long, List<baselink>>>> it = local_
> writeCache.entrySet().iterator();
>             while(it.hasNext()){
>                 Entry<String, Map<Long, List<baselink>>>
> entry = it.next();
>                 String carKey = entry.getKey();
>                 final Map<Long, List<baselink>> value = entry.getValue();
>
>                 if(!mapMatchingData.containsKey(carKey)){
>                     mapMatchingData.put(carKey, value);
>                 }else{
>                     mapMatchingData.invoke(carKey,
>  new EntryProcessor<String, Map<Long, List<baselink>>, Void>() {
>                       @Override
>                       public Void process(MutableEntry<
> String, Map<Long, List<baselink>>> entry, Object... args) {
>                           Map<Long, List<baselink>> map =
> entry.getValue();
>                           map.putAll(value);
>                           entry.setValue(map);
>                           return null;
>                       }
>                   });
>                 }
>
>     }
>
>
> ------------------------------
> bob
>
>
> *From:* Vladislav Pyatkov <vldpyat...@gmail.com>
> *Date:* 2016-09-12 18:37
> *To:* user@ignite.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Increase Ignite instances can't increase the speed of
> compute
> Hello,
>
> I don't understand, what do you try to measure, without code.
> Size of calculation task, size of data moved into network have importance.
>
> Could you please provide code example?
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 12:33 PM, 胡永亮/Bob <hu...@neusoft.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, everyone:
>>
>>     I am using Ignite for computing and cache.
>>
>>     I use the same input data and the same compute logic.
>>     When my ignite cluster's node is 2 in 2 machines, the total cost time
>> is 38s.
>>
>>     But, when I increase the Ignite cluster nodes to 3 in 3 machines, the
>> cost time is 32s/51s/41s
>>     4 instances in 4 machines, the cost time is 32s/40s.
>>
>>      The compute speed can't change faster, what may the reason be?
>>
>>     Thanks.
>>
>> Bob
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------
>> Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
>> accompanying attachment(s)
>> is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be
>> confidential and/or privileged of
>> Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any
>> reader of this communication is
>> not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing,
>> storing, disclosure or copying
>> is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this
>> communication in error,please
>> immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original
>> message and all copies from
>> your system. Thank you.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---------------------------------------
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Vladislav Pyatkov
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------
> Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any
> accompanying attachment(s)
> is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be
> confidential and/or privileged of
> Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader
> of this communication is
> not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing,
> storing, disclosure or copying
> is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this
> communication in error,please
> immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original
> message and all copies from
> your system. Thank you.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------
>

Reply via email to